The Impact of Relative Humidity on the Emission Behaviour of Formaldehyde in Building Materials: Interface Design and Evidence Communication

Evidence must be communicated through interfaces that preserve uncertainty, support interpretation, and avoid turning a model output into an unexplained recommendation. This structured evidence review evaluates "The Impact of Relative Humidity on the Emission Behaviour of Formaldehyde in Building Materials" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in environmental exposure assessment. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through interface design and evidence communication, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda evaluates comprehension, uncertainty displays, actionable explanations, and the consequences of predictable interface misuse.

1. Huang, S., Xiong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015). The Impact of Relative Humidity on the Emission Behaviour of Formaldehyde in Building Materials. Procedia Engineering, 121, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1019 DOI
2. Zhou, X., Li, W., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). Health risk assessment of indoor formaldehyde exposure across Chinese residences: Effects of building material grades. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 490, 137831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137831 DOI
3. Ye, W., Little, J.-C., Won, D., & Zhang, X. (2014). Screening-level estimates of indoor exposure to volatile organic compounds emitted from building materials. Building and Environment, 75, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.018 DOI
4. Wyatt, B. (2025). VOC Exposure and Indoor Air Quality: A Practical Framework for Residential Risk Mitigation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5348101 DOI
5. Harčárová, K., Vilčeková, S., & Balintova, M. (2020). Building Materials as Potential Emission Sources of VOC in the Indoor Environment of Buildings. Key Engineering Materials, 838, 74-80. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.838.74 DOI
6. Opitz, P., Matysik, S., & Herbarth, O. (2017). Health Risk Assessment of Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) considering Long-term trend of VOC. Journal of Environmental and Occupational Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.5455/jeos.20170113084246 DOI
7. Li, X., Zheng, N., Yu, Y., An, Q., & Chen, C. (2025). Comprehensive indoor phthalate risk assessment: A multimedia exposure framework for quantifying population health risk and disease burden. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 499, 140045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.140045 DOI
8. Jianyin Xiong,, Yinping Zhang,, & Shaodan Huang, (2011). Characterisation of VOC and Formaldehyde Emission from Building Materials in a Static Environmental Chamber: Model Development and Application. Indoor and Built Environment, 20(2), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x103874801 DOI
9. Brinke, J.-T., Selvin, S., Hodgson, A.-T., Fisk, W.-J., Mendell, M.-J., Koshland, C.-P., & Daisey, J.-M. (1998). Development of New Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Exposure Metrics and their Relationship to "Sick Building Syndrome" Symptoms. Indoor Air, 8(3), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.t01-1-00002.x DOI
10. Hossain, M. (2025). Indoor Air Quality Risks in U.S. E-Commerce Fulfillment Centers: A Systematic Review and Modeling-Based Risk Assessment of VOC Exposure. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 4(3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijmdsa.v4i3.6911 DOI