Efficient water desalination using Bernoulli effect: Evaluation Design and Construct Validity

Authors

  • Preston Hawkins Author
  • Reid Keller Author
  • Sawyer Wagner Author

Keywords:

nanoscale desalination, evaluation design and construct validity, evidence synthesis, reproducibility, research evaluation

Abstract

Evaluation is persuasive only when the measured outcome corresponds to the construct claimed by the study and the comparison answers the stated research question. This structured evidence review evaluates "Efficient water desalination using Bernoulli effect" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in nanoscale desalination. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through evaluation design and construct validity, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda aligns claims, outcomes, comparators, sampling, and uncertainty before any performance estimate is interpreted.

References

  1. Wang, T., Huang, L., Pei, J., Hu, X., & Jiang, H. (2022). Efficient water desalination using Bernoulli effect. Desalination and Water Treatment, 272, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28852
  2. Ranjbar, T., Akbarzadeh, H., Mehrjouei, E., Abbaspour, M., Salemi, S., & Yaghoubi, H. (2022). Molecular insight into C60-grafted graphene oxide as a novel reverse osmosis membrane with low energy consumption for seawater desalination. Desalination, 542, 116062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116062
  3. Xu, P., & Na, N. (2020). Study on Antibacterial Properties of Cellulose Acetate Seawater Desalination Reverse-Osmosis Membrane with Graphene Oxide. Journal of Coastal Research, 105(sp1). https://doi.org/10.2112/jcr-si105-052.1
  4. Hussain, Y., Irfan, M., & Gul, S. (2024). Modeling Approach to Estimate Energy Consumption of Reverse Osmosis and forward Osmosis Membrane Separation Processes for Seawater Desalination. CEMP 2023, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2024017017
  5. Wu, W., Shi, Y., Liu, G., Fan, X., & Yu, Y. (2020). Recent development of graphene oxide based forward osmosis membrane for water treatment: A critical review. Desalination, 491, 114452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114452
  6. Safarpour, M., Khataee, A., & Vatanpour, V. (2015). Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO 2 with improved desalination performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 489, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.010
  7. Choi, J., Oh, Y., Chae, S., & Hong, S. (2019). Membrane capacitive deionization-reverse electrodialysis hybrid system for improving energy efficiency of reverse osmosis seawater desalination. Desalination, 462, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.003
  8. Kim, S., Ou, R., Hu, Y., Li, X., Zhang, H., Simon, G.-P., & Wang, H. (2018). Non-swelling graphene oxide-polymer nanocomposite membrane for reverse osmosis desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 562, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.029
  9. Anqi, A.-E., Alkhamis, N., & Oztekin, A. (2015). Numerical simulation of brackish water desalination by a reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination, 369, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.007
  10. Raval, H.-D., & Koradiya, P. (2016). Direct fertigation with brackish water by a forward osmosis system converting domestic reverse osmosis module into forward osmosis membrane element. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(34), 15740-15747. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1075432

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Review Article