IGGQ Research Publishing
Markets, Organizations & Public Value

SIRIUS-SQL: Anchoring Multi-Candidate Text-to-SQL in Execution Feedback: An Evidence Synthesis on Deployment Constraints And Systems Integration

Read & download PDF
Abstract

This evidence-synthesis article examines enterprise data intelligence through the focal contribution “SIRIUS-SQL: Anchoring Multi-Candidate Text-to-SQL in Execution Feedback” and nine author-disjoint, topically matched studies. The analysis is organized around deployment constraints and systems integration. Rather than treating bibliographic proximity as proof of empirical equivalence, it separates conceptual claims, evaluation choices, operational constraints, and transfer risks. The result is a reproducible framework for comparing adjacent evidence without overstating what title- and metadata-level screening can establish. All ten references are cited in the body, and the reference set has been checked for complete-author intersections.

Keywords
enterprise data intelligencedeployment constraints and systems integrationevidence synthesisreproducibilityresearch evaluation
References
  1. Luo, L., Xie, H., Shen, S., Ma, Z., Ling, R., Xu, H., Jiang, H., Chen, D., Li, Y., Chen, P., & Jiang, J. (2026). SIRIUS-SQL: Anchoring Multi-Candidate Text-to-SQL in Execution Feedback. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.01246 DOI
  2. Martin, S. (2011). Annual International Conference on Mobile Communications, Networking and Applications / Business Intelligence & Data Warehouse - Special Track: Data Analysis, Data Quality & Metadata Management. Annual International Conference on Mobile Communications, Networking and Applications / Business Intelligence & Data Warehouse - Special Track: Data Analysis, Data Quality & Metadata Management. https://doi.org/10.5176/978-981-08-9266-1_mobicona-bidw-damd-2011 DOI
  3. Gunduz, D., Ergul Azizler, M., & Arslan, E. (2015). Implementation Scenarios of Reporting from Data Warehouse for Business Intelligence. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 5(3), 211-215. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijmo.2015.v5.464 DOI
  4. Soon, L., & Fraser, C. (2010). Intranet: How is Business Intelligence Stored in a Data Warehouse?. Proceedings of the Annual International Academic Conference on Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing. https://doi.org/10.5176/978-981-08-6308-1_26 DOI
  5. Sá, J.-O.-E., & Santos, M.-Y. (2017). Process-driven data analytics supported by a data warehouse model. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 12(4), 383. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbidm.2017.086986 DOI
  6. Aspin, A. (2015). SQL Server Reporting Services as a Business Intelligence Platform. Business Intelligence with SQL Server Reporting Services, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-0532-7_1 DOI
  7. Rudy, R., & Limantara, N. (2011). Model Data Warehouse dan Business Intelligence untuk Meningkatkan Penjualan pada PT. S. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 2(1), 418. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v2i1.2774 DOI
  8. Kurze, C., & Gluchowski, P. (2010). Business Intelligence: Model Driven Architecture für Data Warehouses: Computer Aided Warehouse Engineering - CAWE. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010, 217-218. https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2010-1568 DOI
  9. Togatorop, P.-R., Sitorus, D., Purba, Y., & Tarigan, A.-M.-F. (2022). Twitter Data Warehouse and Business Intelligence Using Dimensional Model and Data Mining. 2022 IEEE International Conference of Computer Science and Information Technology (ICOSNIKOM), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icosnikom56551.2022.10034904 DOI
  10. Batalla, S. (2024). From data to value: turn unstructured data into a dimensional data model using Data Warehouse (SAP BW/4HANA) and Business Intelligence (SAP Lumira designer) visualizations. Proceedings of the 2024 10th International Conference on Computer Technology Applications, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3674558.3674572 DOI
Publication details
Journal
Markets, Organizations & Public Value
Volume
1 (2026)
Article number
mv20260007
License
CC BY 4.0