Automated Molecular Concept Generation and Labeling with Large Language Models: Resource Efficiency and Performance Trade-offs

Authors

  • Nolan Scott Author
  • Preston Peterson Author
  • Reid Richardson Author

Keywords:

language-centered multimodal learning, resource efficiency and performance trade-offs, evidence synthesis, reproducibility, research evaluation

Abstract

Efficiency claims should state which resources are saved, what performance is exchanged, and whether the trade-off remains acceptable at operational scale. This structured evidence review evaluates "Automated Molecular Concept Generation and Labeling with Large Language Models" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in language-centered multimodal learning. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through resource efficiency and performance trade-offs, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda reports compute, memory, energy, latency, and maintenance costs beside task performance at realistic scale.

References

  1. Zhang, Z., Wu, Q., Xia, B., Sun, F., Hu, Z., Sun, Y., & Zhang, S. (2025). Automated Molecular Concept Generation and Labeling with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 6918–6936).
  2. Fan, Y., & Strube, M. (2025). Consistent Discourse-level Temporal Relation Extraction Using Large Language Models. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, 18605-18622. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1010
  3. He, W., Ma, H., Li, S., Dong, H., Zhang, H., & Feng, J. (2023). Using Augmented Small Multimodal Models to Guide Large Language Models for Multimodal Relation Extraction. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12208. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212208
  4. HE, L., WANG, R., DUAN, J., WANG, H., & LI, X. (2026). LLM-VGA: Large Language Model-Augmented Visual Generation with Hierarchical Bidirectional Alignment for Multimodal Relation Extraction. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2025edp7173
  5. Li, Z., Pang, N., & Zhao, X. (2024). Instruction Tuning Large Language Models for Multimodal Relation Extraction Using LoRA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7707-5_30
  6. Aidynkyzy, A. (2026). FROM NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION TO RELATION EXTRACTION: LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL ASSISTED CONSTRUCTION OF THE KAZAKH RELATION EXTRACTION DATASET. Вестник Академии гражданской авиации, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.53364/24138614_2026_41_2_13
  7. Liu, B., & Qi, G. (2025). LLM-CG: Large language model-enhanced constraint graph for distantly supervised relation extraction. Neurocomputing, 655, 131426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131426
  8. Zhao, H., Yilahun, H., & Hamdulla, A. (2023). Pipeline Chain-of-Thought: A Prompt Method for Large Language Model Relation Extraction. 2023 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1109/ialp61005.2023.10337264
  9. Choi, G., & Kim, H. (2025). Automated Claim–Evidence Extraction for Political Discourse Analysis: A Large Language Model Approach to Rodong Sinmun Editorials. Proceedings of the Eighth Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.fever-1.1
  10. Shah, P. (2025). Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) Noise Resistance. . https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2025-6z9zx

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Review Article